Sony VAIO Z and Apple MacBook Pro Comparison

For two years I owned an Apple MacBook Pro which became not anything however problem. I subsequently replaced it two months ago with a Sony VAIO Z. In this newsletter, I shall evaluate the two notebooks.

macbookair11_lifestyle__17_.jpg (1600×900)

Before I begin, I have to observe that the MacBook Pro become a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 2008 refresh model costing £1300 when new, with a 4GB RAM and 7200 RPM difficult pressure improve. The VAIO Z is a custom construct from the Sony Style Store, the VAIO Z V collection lacking the DVD power and with an everyday tough force in place of the quad SSD of its more expensive X series brethren. On top of this version, I introduced a £30 (considering that improved to £50) improve to from 2.Four GHz to two.53 GHz Intel Core i5 processor and the £50 (seeing that accelerated to £70) 1920×1080 pixel display in preference to the standard 1600×900. This introduced the smaller VAIO to £1400, a growth of £100.

I’ll break the contrast between the two up into categories:


I opted for the £50 upgrade to the 1920×1080 (Full HD) show on the 13.1″ VAIO Z, and even as the gamut is de facto a whole lot higher than the 15″ MacBook Pro (on par with or maybe even slightly better than my HP LP2475w display you see it with to the left), the whole HD decision is just too much for a thirteen.1″ screen. By contrast, the two inches large MacBook Pro best had a 1440×900 screen, and that felt a high pixel density on the time! The DPI settings in Windows 7 to alleviate the trouble rather, but setting a better DPI comes with its very own toll – incompatibility with a few software, Dreamweaver CS4 to name one out. As you can see from the screenshot, for a maximum of Dreamweaver’s interface, the DPI settings have no impact (they must make UI elements and textual content bigger) however in the residences bar at the lowest the bigger size reasons some of the alternatives to be cut off the display. Other packages have smaller problems which inc


Related Articles :

lude pixellated icons and UI factors.


The 2.Fifty three GHz Intel Core i5-520M processor within the VAIO without a doubt is a mild improvement over the two.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo of the MacBook, but it is to be predicted, years have surpassed since the MacBook changed into introduced out. To be honest, it is hard to compare overall performance as the MacBook became jogging Snow Leopard and the VAIO of the path is strolling Windows 7, so the working machine likely has more of a power on perceived performance than the processor.

The slightly faster 7200 RPM power in the MacBook helped the snappiness no stop, so I’m quite sure an upgrade from the 5400 RPM pressure to an SSD would assist the VAIO no stop.

apple-macbook-pro-raw.jpg (1024×1024)

Both laptops were fitted with 4GB RAM, which in no way seemed enough within the MacBook and seems to be even greater of a burden on Windows 7. With Photoshop, Illustrator, Dreamweaver and Firefox open, the machine slows to a move slowly. The VAIO Z has a smart little transfer to swap between the Intel included photos (k for net surfing) and the onboard NVIDIA GT 330M 1GB photographs, and an ‘Auto’ function that switches to the incorporated graphics while on battery energy. It’s with a few trepidation that I bought some other computer with NVIDIA pictures, on account that it’s their fault my MacBook died, but anything. They’ve probably constant that difficulty now. I’m not a gaming individual, so I’ve not given the NVIDIA chip a large exercise, but for some reason, Photoshop CS4 seems to lag on the VAIO. Even with not anything else open (to take away RAM for the purpose), simple stuff like scrolling around a picture or zooming has a quite nasty put off. The equal moves were once buttery easy on the MacBook, and are not almost so terrible on my desktop. Odd. Another quite large problem is that with the pix transfer to the car, the pc holds off switching the photographs if anything is using it that would be laid low with the change. Sometimes this cutoff comes into action without an apparent purpose, refusing to replace portraits, and every so often the cutoff fails to work, inflicting the laptop to crash and bluescreen, or at least, force close something application was the usage of the images. I’m getting a chunk fed up of Photoshop crashing and dropping all my work just due to the fact I unplugged the computer, so now the transfer is quite a whole lot permanently set to NVIDIA simplest mode. Great concept and the battery existence is a chunk higher whilst the use of the included photographs, however, the implementation of the OS is my no method seamless.


The primary promoting factor (and the cause it became so expensive in comparison to its competitors) of the VAIO is its weight. At a claimed 1.3 kilos as opposed to the two.6 of the MacBook, it is a good deal more satisfactory to hold the round in a bag. Slipped in a satchel, you barely notice it is there (except you also throw inside the bulky power deliver and its three pin lead). By contrast, the sporting the MacBook round result in a few pretty stiff shoulders. The chicklet keyboard at the VAIO is ace – very strong with well spaced and positioned keys. The feel could be very just like an Apple desktop keyboard. The trackpad, however, is not. It’s a piece too small, the press buttons are too close, making your thumb cramp, and the actual pointing motion – horrible. The cursor jumps round reputedly at random. Multitouch zooming through pinch exists, however only in some software (no longer Creative Suite) and with a totally jerky motion. It’s difficult to type about the MacBook’s keyboard and trackpad considering they most effective worked intermittently after about a yr (the ribbon cable would not live in its connector), but when they labored, the trackpad was a pride. Pinching and scrolling round Photoshop documents changed into better than a mouse, and I ought to imagine it to be even better in newer MacBooks because of their larger glass trackpads. The carbon fiber lid at the VAIO in all fairness strong considering its thickness, and impressively thin, and the thick aluminum block that paperwork the chassis gives no flex. It’s a shame approximately the plastic shell below the aluminum block which forms the bottom, as that is very reasonably-priced feeling as compared the full metal shell of the MacBook. It’s full of holes, vents, and stickers like a reasonably-priced laptop, and seems definitely out of vicinity on something costing £1400. The wi-fi switch on the bottom front is a stupid addition – you bump it to off every time you circulate the laptop, they must look ahead to it to reconnect. Why would you even need to turn off the wireless anyway?


rosegold-macbook-1.jpg (2500×1666)

I’ve got a bit of a love-hate dating with the VAIO Z. It could be so much better if these little niggles had been taken care of, and I’m nevertheless not sure it feels really worth the £1400. I assume it might advantage substantially from 8GB RAM and an SSD, so I’ll need to look into it whilst the charges for DDR3 come back off. I’m additionally planning to improve with Creative suite CS5 inside the very close to future, so optimistically with the intention to sort many of the troubles there. I don’t experience cozy running on any such small display screen, I lots pick my computer with its gargantuan power and lots of desktop area so I can’t help thinking if I ought to have made do with an inexpensive pc. I sold the VAIO on-line without ever having seen one, which turned into probably a huge mistake, but with the MacBook lifeless, I wished a pc – speedy. That failed to even exercise session so well – it took Sony almost a month from ordering to build the custom laptop and get it to me. At least they kept me nicely knowledgeable as to the development, and I in no way ought to visit a pretentious Apple ‘Genius bar’ once more.

Jeffery D. Silvers
Love and share my articles, I will be happy to react on it !