Sony VAIO Z and Apple MacBook Pro Comparison

For two years, I owned an Apple MacBook Pro, which became not anything but a problem. I subsequently replaced it two months ago with a Sony VAIO Z. In this newsletter, I shall evaluate the two notebooks.


Before I begin, I observe that the MacBook Pro becomes a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 2008 refresh model costing £1300 when new, with 4GB RAM and 7200 RPM difficult pressure improvement. The VAIO Z is a custom construct from the Sony Style Store; the VAIO Z V collection lacks DVD power and has an everyday tough force in place of the quad SSD of its more expensive X series brethren. On top of this version, I introduced a £30 (considering that improved to £50) improvement from 2.Four GHz to two.53 GHz Intel Core i5 processor and the £50 (seeing that accelerated to £70) 1920×1080 pixel display in preference to the standard 1600×900. This introduced the smaller VAIO to £1400, a growth of £100.

I’ll break the contrast between the two up into categories:


I opted for the £50 upgrade to the 1920×1080 (Full HD) show on the 13.1″ VAIO Z. Even as the gamut is de facto a whole lot higher than the 15″ MacBook Pro (on par with or maybe even slightly better than my HP LP2475w display you see it with to the left), the whole HD decision is just too much for a thirteen.1″ screen. By contrast, the two-inch large MacBook Pro best had a 1440×900 screen, and that felt a high pixel density on time! The DPI settings in Windows 7 alleviate the trouble, but setting a better DPI comes with its toll – incompatibility with a few software, Dreamweaver CS4, to name one out. As you can see from the screenshot, for a maximum of Dreamweaver’s interface, the DPI settings have no impact (they must make UI elements and textual content bigger); however, in the residences bar at the lowest, the bigger size causes some of the alternatives to be cut off the display. Other packages have smaller problems, which inc.

Related Articles :

lude pixellated icons and UI factors.


The 2. Fifty-three GHz Intel Core i5-520M processor within the VAIO, without a doubt, is a mild improvement over the two.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo of the MacBook. Still, it is to be predicted that years have passed since the MacBook was introduced. It is hard to compare overall performance as the MacBook became jogging Snow Leopard, and the VAIO of the path is strolling Windows 7. Hence, the working machine likely has more power on perceived performance than the processor.

The slightly faster 7200 RPM power in the MacBook helped the snappiness no stop, so I’m sure an upgrade from the 5400 RPM pressure to an SSD would assist the VAIO no halt.


Both laptops were fitted with 4GB RAM, which in no way seemed enough within the MacBook and seemed to be even greater of a burden on Windows 7. The machine slows slowly with Photoshop, Illustrator, Dreamweaver, and Firefox open. The VAIO Z has a smart little transfer to swap between the Intel-included photos (k for net surfing), the onboard NVIDIA GT 330M 1GB photographs, and an ‘Auto’ function that switches to the incorporated graphics while on battery energy. It’s with a little trepidation that I bought some other computer with NVIDIA pictures, on account that it’s their fault my MacBook died, but anything.

They’ve probably constantly had that difficulty now. I’m not a gaming individual, so I’ve not given the NVIDIA chip a large exercise, but for some reason, Photoshop CS4 seems to lag on the VAIO. Even with nothing else open (to remove RAM for the purpose), simple stuff like scrolling around a picture or zooming has a nasty put-off.

The equal moves were once easy on the MacBook and are not almost terrible on my desktop. Odd. Another quite large problem is that with the pix transfer to the car, the PC holds off, switching the photographs if anything uses it that would be laid low with the change. Sometimes, this cutoff comes into action without an apparent purpose, refusing to replace portraits.

Every so often, the cutoff fails to work, inflicting the laptop to crash and bluescreen, or at least force close something application was the usage of the images. I’m getting a chunk fed up with Photoshop hitting and dropping all my work just because I unplugged the computer, so now the transfer is quite a lot permanently set to NVIDIA simplest mode. It is a great concept, and the battery existence is a chunk higher while using the included photographs; however, the OS’s implementation is my no method seamless.


The primary promoting factor (and the cause it became so expensive compared to its competitors) of the VAIO is its weight. Holding the round in a bag is more satisfactory at a claimed 1.3 kilos instead of the two.6 of the MacBook. Slipped in a suitcase, you barely notice it is there (except you also throw inside the bulky power deliver and its three-pin lead). By contrast, sporting the MacBook round results in a few stiff shoulders. The chicklet keyboard at the VAIO is ace – very strong with well-spaced and positioned keys. The feel could be just like an Apple desktop keyboard. The trackpad, however, is not. It’s a piece too small, the press buttons are too close, making your thumb cramp, and the actual pointing motion – is horrible. The cursor jumps around reputedly at random.

However, multitouch zooming through pinch exists only in some software (no longer Creative Suite) and with a jerky motion. It isn’t easy to type about the MacBook’s keyboard and trackpad, considering they most effectively worked intermittently after about a year (the ribbon cable would not live in its connector). Still, when they labored, the trackpad was a pride. Pinching and scrolling around Photoshop documents became better than a mouse, and I ought to imagine it to be even better in newer MacBooks because of their larger glass trackpads. The carbon fiber lid at the VAIO is, in all fairness, strong considering its thickness and impressively thin, and the thick aluminum block that paperwork the chassis gives no flex.

It’s a shame that the plastic shell below the aluminum block, which forms the bottom, is a very reasonably priced feeling compared to the full metal shell of the MacBook. It’s full of holes, vents, and stickers like a reasonably-priced laptop and seems definitely out of vicinity on something costing £1400. The Wi-Fi switch on the bottom front is a stupid addition – you bump it off every time you circulate the laptop, and they must look ahead to reconnect. Why would you even need to turn off the wireless anyway?



I’ve got a bit of a love-hate dating with the VAIO Z. It could be so much better if these little niggles had been taken care of, and I’m nevertheless not sure it feels worth the £1400. I assume it might be an advantage from 8GB RAM and an SSD, so I’ll need to look into it while the charges for DDR3 come back off. I’m also planning to improve with Creative Suite CS5 soon, so optimistically, I can sort out many of the troubles there. I don’t experience cozy running on any such small display screen;

I pick my computer with its immense power and desktop area, so I can’t help wondering if I should have made do with an inexpensive PC. I sold the VAIO online without ever having seen one, which probably turned into a huge mistake, but with the MacBook lifeless, I wished for a PC. That failed even to exercise session so well – it took Sony almost a month from ordering to build the custom laptop and get it to me. At least they kept me nicely knowledgeable about the development, and I never ought to visit a pretentious Apple ‘Genius bar’ once more.

Jeffery D. Silvers
Love and share my articles, I will be happy to react on it ! Spent 2002-2009 promoting weed whackers in Edison, NJ. Earned praise for importing junk food for fun and profit. Spent 2001-2006 exporting teddy bears in Atlantic City, NJ. Had some great experience investing in tattoos in Fort Walton Beach, FL. Spent 2002-2007 selling action figures in the aftermarket. Enthusiastic about working on basketballs on the black market.