When it comes to schools and kids, you wouldn’t think there would be much to debate about. After all, all Americans want kids to succeed. All Americans want smart, well-educated children, safe and effective schools, and great teachers. The trick is, of course, that not everybody agrees on how we can best go about getting all of these things.
That’s why charter schools have become the center of so much debate in America. Charter schools are designed to help the students who need it most, but critics don’t feel that charter schools are the best solution to the problem – and, in fact, many feel that charter schools are making the problem worse. How did we get here? Let’s take a look at the debate.
The case for charter schools
Charter schools are based on a pretty simple idea: that private companies can run more efficient and effective schools than the government. Charter schools are private schools that get federal funding and other perks. They are usually established in lower income areas, where they draw in kids that are being underserved by local schools. Thanks to innovation and competition, charter schools have new and effective tools to use in their quest to help kids learn, and in many case they’ve been very effective at churning out highly educated graduates.
Charter schools can be a big deal for students in underperforming districts. They’re new and well-funded, a far cry from the rough schools that serve some of these areas. Young teachers and fresh methods are things that some of these districts don’t see often. Charter school management companies are in competition with each other, so – unlike public schools – they need to deliver the goods if they want to keep making money.
The case against charter schools
If charter schools help kids, then who could be against them? Well, it’s not quite so simple. While charter schools can certainly help some kids, they’re not necessarily good for all kids, and their existence can also make life tougher for taxpayers and teachers.
Charter schools are judged by their ability to produce highly educated students, so they’re incentivized to grab the best and the brightest students from the areas they pop up in. Charter schools can use a variety of methods to control who they take in, and often end up taking the best students away from failing schools. That can be good news for those students, but it’s bad news for the ones left behind! Students with special needs are often left behind by charter schools, and the over-burdened public schools are left with their most demanding and difficult charges while the charter school takes the rising stars.
To make matters worse, charter schools sometimes set up shop on public school property. Cash-strapped schools sometimes find themselves co-habitating with newer charter schools, meaning that public school resources are going to charter schools even as charter schools siphon off the brightest students from the public school!
And not everyone likes the idea of a private charter school. Stakeholders like teachers look at charter schools with some apprehension, and the public teachers’ unions are powerful forces in state and federal politics. When lawyers and lobbyists get involved, things get even more messy.
The debate rages on
The fact of the matter is that charter schools have both pros and cons to them – and that neither side of this entrenched debate is going to give up much ground anytime soon. For now, charter schools and public schools both have a role to play in America.